Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/11/2015 6:05:11 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Hojczyk

Judge Napolitano just said said on Fox Business…he filled in on some radio show and saw shocked 10-1 against Megyn Kelly


2 posted on 08/11/2015 6:10:09 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Donald Trump’s Plan for Your Taxes Might Be EXACTLY What He Needs to Win the White House
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3322838/posts


3 posted on 08/11/2015 6:10:39 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

How do you replace a 500,000 word tax code with a soundbite?

Of course he doesn’t have a full plan. He will need to craft a plan that will get through congress. That is going to take a lot of negotiation. At least he has vision.


4 posted on 08/11/2015 6:13:10 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Resistance to Tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Have none of these people read his book?

Five point plan, all laid out.

It’s not rocket surgery...


5 posted on 08/11/2015 6:13:12 AM PDT by papertyger (If the government doesn't obey the Constitution, what is treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

ISIS plan: “they’ll be in so much trouble if I’m elected”.
Immigration plan: “build a wall. charge the mexicans”.
Iraq plan : “hit them, and then take their oil”.
Tax plan: “put H&R block out of business”.

with specifics like this, I can certainly see why he is such an attractive candidate.


6 posted on 08/11/2015 6:14:47 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; Taxman

The best way to simplify the income tax is to abolish it and the IRS.


11 posted on 08/11/2015 6:16:44 AM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

It’s basically a return to the original income tax of 1913, which in all honesty was perfectly fine. One page, very, very low rate on everyone, and very slight graduation topping at 6.5%.


20 posted on 08/11/2015 6:45:38 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

As good a plan as any I’ve come up with (not that I’m a tax lawyer).

But something meaningful has got to be done. Especially since the tyrants have shown us they have no qualms about using the heavy hand of the IRS for political purposes.

Apparently a Republican controlled Congress can’t seem to put a criminal like Lerner in jail, much less reign in the IRS, so this is the next best thing.


22 posted on 08/11/2015 6:51:10 AM PDT by Paulie (America without Christianity is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
He is close, this is from my tax( professionals ) gnomes...

* No Fair Tax, Flat Tax yes as an alternative to the current system and get rid of the current system when adoption is at a high percentage. It won't pass Congress any other way.
* One gnome a CPA says they are fine with a Flat Tax, they will shift their practice to helping small businesses with their accounting and making money.

It is all good, we just need a candidate ( Trump?, Cruz, Walker, Carlie? ) with the cohones to make it priority in the 1st 100 days...

23 posted on 08/11/2015 6:58:47 AM PDT by taildragger (It's Cruz & Walker. Anything else is a Yugo with Racing Stripes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; P-Marlowe; TNMOUTH

Someone had a 3 rate ‘flat tax’ a few years ago (Forbes, maybe), and it was still called a flat tax.

His plan in 2011 was a 4 rate ‘flat tax’:

•Up to $30,000 of taxable income: 1%
•From $30,000 to $100,000: 5%
•From $100,000 to $1 million: 10%
•On $1 million or above: 15%

I like it far better than a straight flat tax, because 10% of a poor man’s budget is a potential deal breaker. In this plan, 15% of a millionaire’s income is not a burden at all.

That said, I would see the entire budget as spent as being funded by this tax, so SSN and Med be ended as separate line items and incorporated in the above tax plan. It might force 2%, 10%, 20%, 30%, but none of those are crippling, and especially if the payroll taxes are removed as separate items, given that they were approximately a 7% bite out of every paycheck.

I also think it’s wise to have EVERY American with skin in the game.


26 posted on 08/11/2015 7:24:56 AM PDT by xzins (Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; P-Marlowe; TNMOUTH

CORRECTION - SEE CAPS BELOW

Someone had a 3 rate ‘flat tax’ a few years ago (Forbes, maybe), and it was still called a flat tax.

TRUMP’S plan in 2011 was a 4 rate ‘flat tax’:

•Up to $30,000 of taxable income: 1%
•From $30,000 to $100,000: 5%
•From $100,000 to $1 million: 10%
•On $1 million or above: 15%

I like it far better than a straight flat tax, because 10% of a poor man’s budget is a potential deal breaker. In this plan, 15% of a millionaire’s income is not a burden at all.

That said, I would see the entire budget as spent as being funded by this tax, so SSN and Med be ended as separate line items and incorporated in the above tax plan. It might force 2%, 10%, 20%, 30%, but none of those are crippling, and especially if the payroll taxes are removed as separate items, given that they were approximately a 7% bite out of every paycheck.

I also think it’s wise to have EVERY American with skin in the game.


27 posted on 08/11/2015 7:27:06 AM PDT by xzins (Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

If a president Trump attacks the tax code, and the anti-business regulations that have been put in place since the GHWB administration, you are going to see American business grow like you haven’t seen since the Reagan years.

I would love to see a return to the 80s. I am in my late 50s, and the best time of my life was during the Reagan years.

I want to live it again!


29 posted on 08/11/2015 7:33:17 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Any tax system based on income, regardless of rates, is not enforcable in America as it presently exist. Voluntary compliance is declining every year and the underground economy is overtaking the official economy. A fast growing number of individual and businesses have discovered that the rewards for non compliance are greater than the penalities. Rates can not be set high enough to compensate for avoidance and can not be set low enough to gain universal compliance. Like it or not, we are in a new world and a tax system designed for a primarily wage based economy is no longer able to generate the necessary income.

The income tax does allow for a high degree of control by the political class and as long as government has unlimited ability to borrow, the desire for control will remain more important than the need for revenue.


36 posted on 08/11/2015 8:06:43 AM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

No real Conservative should defend any form of the income tax. Consumption based taxes and tariffs are Conservative tax plans.


38 posted on 08/11/2015 8:11:37 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Trump cannot get specific. If he does, then his allure is gone. For him to be effective in his goal, he must be everything to everyone.


41 posted on 08/11/2015 8:31:35 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

BFLR


43 posted on 08/11/2015 8:33:57 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

I thought he already had a proposal...

Here it is:

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/080415/america-donald-trump-president.asp

TRUMP’s FIVE-POINT TAX PLAN

One carryover from Trump’s 2000 presidential platform is his five-point tax plan. The plan in 2015 is slightly modified to account for inflation and larger government debt, but otherwise, it is very similar.

Trump wants a repeal of the U.S. death tax, or what the IRS refers to as the estate tax. Trump cites a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study that suggests that some 1.5 million new jobs aren’t created because of the tax on large wealth transfers to non-spouse heirs. As of 2015, the estate tax applies to estates larger than $5.43 million.

President Trump would also seek to reduce taxes on capital gains and dividends; “capitalism requires capital,” as Trump noted in a speech. He wants corporate taxes set at zero to encourage American companies to stay and hire domestically, creating jobs at home.

Along with his 20% tariff on imported goods, Trump also wants to impose an additional 20% tax on companies that hire foreign workers.

The fifth part of the five-point plan is a simplified tax code with the following brackets: 1% tax on the first $30,000 in income, 5% tax on all income between $30,000 and $100,000, 10% tax on all income between $100,000 and $1 million, and a 15% rate on all income above $1 million.


44 posted on 08/11/2015 8:34:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

With all due respect and empathy for accountants, it is ridiculous the amount of money spent each year preparing and filing taxes in the US. The tax code is ridiculously complex.


47 posted on 08/11/2015 8:46:14 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

That was a BS answer. It is like saying we need to make the government more efficient. Great, but HOW?!

And when you tell low income voters that they will no longer receive a $2-6,000 “refund” on taxes they never paid to begin with (the EITC), how happy do you think they will be? I think EVERYONE should have skin in the game, but the 50% who currently have none probably won’t agree...

How do you handle rental property? Will you still allow depreciation? What about investment income? Retirements? When is income income? Do you tax capital gains? How? At what rate?

Just saying “Simplify” doesn’t cut it. That isn’t a plan. That is just mealy-mouth BS.


48 posted on 08/11/2015 8:50:31 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Won’t give whole plan yet.... nor will he ever


64 posted on 08/11/2015 9:21:27 PM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson