Posted on 08/08/2015 8:37:25 AM PDT by 11th Commandment
The biggest winner of the Thursday nights debates was Carly Fiorina, who was on the under-card with the goofy kids.
With polls showing she won by between 73 to 87 percent, the Democrats are preparing to attack her with long knives for destroying Hewlett-Packards culture. But Carly Fiorinas ability to turn around H-P and strength to survive breast cancer, will make it tough for Democrats to successfully trash her.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Carly Fiorina defended fellow feminazi Megyn Kelly. She has disqualified herself.
Trashing? Why, I thought that wasn't allowed. You know, the War on Women and such.
Maybe Carly can get Trump to protect her from the media that’s going to eat her alive...
Did she defend Meghan? No... went to his (Trump’s) behavior which is fair. Look, Trump bested Kelly during the debate... his answer was funny and good until he personally attacked Kelly. Compare how Carly handled Chris Matthews and you will see the difference.
Now now.
If Fiorina downsized the fedgov the way she ‘downsized’ HP we’d be out of debt in no time!
So far, and this is why I am starting to study her more, very person that has tried to gotcha her has been eviscerated by her. Another reason I respect her is that before the debate she was not preparing with her team but given a 35 minutes interview to Steven Crowder.
carly fiorina, conservative honey badger?
http://louderwithcrowder.com/carly-fiorina-uncensored-goes-full-honey-badger-on-sjw-feminists/
Carly needs to stay in the primaries for a long time. She’s the only one who can say what needs to be said about HRC. Any man will be promptly “Lazio’d.” (Rick Lazio, who in 2000 NY Senate debate with HRC “violated her space” by approaching her podium with a pledge he wanted her to sign. The media provided the outrage, so she didn’t have to.)
She’s quick on her feet and can respond with wit and intelligence. Was she a failure at HP? That’s certainly up for debate and scrutiny, but Carly’s worst days at HP were still a hundred times better than Shrillary’s best days in the State Department.
Carly has been repeatedly named the worst tech CEO of all-time. Her background is softer than pudding. She is nowhere near Presidential material... but she very much needs to stay in the race as long as Hillary is a candidate. Carly ripped Barbara Boxer to shreds (even though Babs still won), and no other GOP candidate can savage Hillary’s record as cleanly and openly as Carly. I want her at 1 percent, but still campaigning, all the way until next NOV, or until Hillary drops out. If the GOP had any interest in winning, they would be helping Carly as much as is needed. She needs to be one of the last 4 GOP candidates standing.
Great thought.
It appears that during her bid to defeat boxer in 2014 she supported the DREAM act, Common Core and thinks that climate change is caused by humans.
Carly may be good at taking Hillary down a peg, but I don’t know that she’s a conservative. Given her attack on Trump, I’d say she is GOPe.
They did it when she ran against Boxer, and it worked.
Just like they said Romney buying Bain Capital caused the death of a Woman. Wasn’t true, doesn’t matter.
When you control the Entertainment Media, News Media and the Educational System, you cannot be defeated.
Whatever Republican is Nominated, 2016 will be day after day of slanted News Coverage, day after day of The Daily Show, day after day of the Late Night talk shows and a weekly hit job from SNL to convince the Sheeple that the Republican Candidate wants to do to them what a Dentist did to poor innocent Cecil the Lion.
President Clinton or President Sanders, decisions, decisions.
Joining the media attack on Trump has hurt her badly. Very bad strategy: the media is not her friend and will destroy her if there is any conservatism in her (which I’m not convinced of, but have been willing to consider especially after her good performance in the debate).
Thus, the irony of my reply above.
I wouldn't care that she knocked Trump, I get it. It's the hypocrisy, actually a lie that she didn't disclose her ties too
>>Trashing? Why, I thought that wasn’t allowed. You know, the War on Women and such.
You know the rules. Its only trashing when we do it. When they do it, its just “exposing the TROOF” and their legion of loyal TROOF-checkers will verify that!
The Compaq deal was risky, but paid off over time. CEO’s are often criticized for making short term decisions that might raise the stock price and their benefits package but hurt the company in the long term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.