Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChariotBuilder

Are you really this stupid or do you have to work on it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKvT6DDR-4A
Mark Levin Explains Ted Cruz IS a Natural Born Citizen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-C69vCECyA
Mark Levin confornted by a loser Birther

The US Constitution doesn’t say ANYTHING about having to have (2) US Citizen Parents.

Now, as Levin said, time to go back to your mom’s basement.


38 posted on 08/08/2015 5:29:21 AM PDT by parksstp (Cruz it or lose it. Ahead with Ted. 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: parksstp

Ted loves this country and that’s all I care about. All of the 17 candidates can prove where they were born. Too bad, we can’t say the same about the squatter in the WH.


46 posted on 08/08/2015 5:41:16 AM PDT by Catsrus (a and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

Ya could look it up.


85 posted on 08/08/2015 6:35:41 AM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp
The US Constitution doesn’t say ANYTHING about having to have (2) US Citizen Parents.

Actually it says you need three.

161 posted on 08/08/2015 11:47:35 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republican Freed the Slaves" month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp
Mark Levin Explains Ted Cruz IS a Natural Born Citizen

At 00:18 Levin states that Ted Cruz is a naturalized U.S. Citizen.

Natural born Citizens don't need to be naturalized. Levin is totally clueless about Natural Law.

Mark Levin Attacks Birthers: Admits He Hasn't Studied Issue; Declares Canadian-Born Cruz Eligible

Note the reference to Natural Law in the first sentence of our Declaration of Independence.

It is crystal clear that the Founding Fathers used the Natural Law definition of 'natural born Citizen' when they wrote Article II. By invoking "The Laws of Nature and Nature's God" the 56 signers of the Declaration incorporated a legal standard of freedom into the forms of government that would follow.

President John Quincy Adams, writing in 1839, looked back at the founding period and recognized the true meaning of the Declaration's reliance on the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." He observed that the American people's "charter was the Declaration of Independence. Their rights, the natural rights of mankind. Their government, such as should be instituted by the people, under the solemn mutual pledges of perpetual union, founded on the self-evident truth's proclaimed in the Declaration."

The Constitution, Vattel, and “Natural Born Citizen”: What Our Framers Knew

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution - The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same

"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.

A Dissertation on Manner of Acquiring Character & Privileges of Citizen of U.S.-by David Ramsay-1789

The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)

The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law

Publications of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Volume 20 - Use of The Law of Nations by the Constitutional Convention

The Biggest Cover-up in American History

171 posted on 08/08/2015 1:00:54 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

>> The US Constitution doesn’t say ANYTHING about having to have (2) US Citizen Parents <<

Yeah, but we’ve been told time and again via multiple FR birther threads that anything written by Monsieur Emmerich de Vattel “trumps” not only the Constitution, but all laws passed by Congress and all federal court decisions. So there!

Anyway, I guess we need to get Dr. Orly Taitz on the case. Only then will we have a definitive answer.


218 posted on 08/16/2015 5:03:47 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson