I don't see Trump saying "I thought it was an unfair question" after the fact as fighting. Yo are free to think it is, but it can't accomplish a thing, it just comes across as whining.
I guess you think Trump should just roll over and take it when he’s treated unfairly, like Romney did with Candy Crowley.
You should never assume you know what others think as doing so reveals you have no idea what you are talking about. Any protestations at the time would have been a defense. But to complain about it now is just whining.
You don’t like fighters I guess.
Again you "guess" and again you are wrong.
That was a PERFECT response.
Some people have lost their bearing in here.
I have always valued clear-thinking conservatives. I thought conservatism was based on reason. I guess some are along for the ride.
“You should never assume you know what others think as doing so reveals you have no idea what you are talking about.”
We all make assumptions about other people’s motives based on the evidence at hand. It took me two seconds to find examples in your own comments where you did the same. Here’s an example:
“Hume also works for Murdoch.
But I do believe the entire lot is in the tank for Bush”
Here’s another one:
“’Trump has “evolved” on single payer. What a liar.’
Big time.”
So, yes, I made an assumption on what you think based on your comments. No apologies.
You are free to call it whining if you like, but his criticisms of unfair treatment are valid, whether they came post debate or not.