[Salamander]

Give me a break.

Megyn swears she “knows that women won’t like that”.

Here’s some harder facts.

More women do not like *her* because they perceive her as being prettier than they are, than “won’t like Trump.”

For every woman “offended by Trump”, there will be 5 who are glad he got in her face.

She’s a woman.

She knows how womens’ minds work.

Her *sole function* on Fox is eye candy for men.

Period.

[Norm Lenhart]

More women do not like *her* because they perceive her as being prettier than they are, than “won’t like Trump.”

Then women need their glasses checked or their self esteem worked on because she ain’t all that. She has a face shaped like a mans in drag and a decent body.

[noiseman]

The appropriate response to the ridiculous "misogyny" claim would be to ask Megyn if she would be equally concerned about a candidate using disparaging terms toward other men. I'm sick and tired of certain (generally liberal) women trying to have it both ways: On the one hand, they demand to be considered to be no different than a man, yet on the other they want to be treated more gently because of their gender.

Either women are equal to men, just as capable of being anything up to and including trained killers in the military, or they are fragile little flowers who must be shielded from even insensitive remarks lest they wilt in response. Choose one or the other Megyn.