Posted on 08/05/2015 8:30:06 AM PDT by Dave346
Is this supposed to dissuade us?
Only in the mind of a career appeaser of terrorists like Kerry is this an argument against the deal.
But Hanoi John can't help being what he is. And so his anti-deal argument comes down to, "It'll hurt the Ayatollah's feelings."
Reneging on the nuclear agreement, which has the support of the major world powers, would constitute a setback for Washington and justify anti-American animus in Iran.
The ayatollah constantly believed that we are untrustworthy, that you cant negotiate with us, that we will screw them, Kerry said. "[Having Congress vote down the nuclear pact] will be the ultimate screwing.
The United States Congress will prove the ayatollahs suspicion, and theres no way hes ever coming back. He will not come back to negotiate. Out of dignity, out of a suspicion that you cant trust America. America is not going to negotiate in good faith. It didnt negotiate in good faith now, would be his point.
That would be the guy who, after the deal, chants "Death to America".
Maybe it's just me, but I have a sneaking suspicion that Iran wasn't negotiating in good faith to begin with.
Kerry keeps taking the perceived point of view of the enemy. And he whines about how "embarrassed" he will be if the deal is rejected.
And yet Iran knew all along that the deal had to be ratified by Congress. Senator Tom Cotton and other Senators sent a letter to Iran warning of just that. In response, Obama inc. lost their minds and dubbed them the #47Traitors on Twitter.
It was a disgusting and pathetic show from a disgusting and pathetic administration.
Iran and Kerry both knew any deal had to get through Congress. Now Kerry is whining that the Ayatollah won't trust us anymore. But the only trusting party at the table was Kerry. The Ayatollah was out to give us the ultimate screwing.
Despite all the nonsense about "hardliners" and "moderates", the Ayatollah and the so-called moderates were on the same page. They were playing "Good Terrorist" and "Bad Terrorist" with us. We were the ones who had a split between appeasers and national security patriots.
If the Iran Nuke deal goes through, Iran will get nuclear weapons and the Ayatollah will have given us the ultimate screwing. But he'll have to share the credit with Obama and Kerry.
I can believe it, but I never knew that Kerry was a rump ranger. Arabs are heavily into that s#!+- literally. They never miss an opportunity with their prisoners.
I’m sorry, but when did teabagging the ayatollah become US foreign policy.
Awesome! Great idea! Let's Do It!
p.s. I can't wait to see the twitter reaction from Trump!
Personally, I’d pay money to watch Kerry TRY to screw an ayatollah!
Kerry would never screw the Ayatollah. He is only interested in screwing the American people. This is the guy who put in for a Purple Heart because he had a grain of rice stuck in his ass cheek.
Barry was writing the ayatollahs love letters back before the 2008 election.
HF
ROFL!
I like this idea better than the agreement!
Kerry keeps taking the perceived point of view of the enemy. And he whines about how “embarrassed” he will be if the deal is rejected.
Thermonuclear Dawn
Great name for a heavy metal band.
Bring in co-d*c#head James Taylor to sing about it.
Me too. it was another one of those “never forget” moments in our history.
The one thing I don’t remember though is Mitt Romney saying that the Obama’s administrations comments of #47Traitors was hurtful and not helping the cause...hmmmmm
Is it just me and my Irish memory, or is anyone else still really pissed off at Iran over the hostage crisis 35 years ago?
I’m with you........long memory and all! And they’ve only gotten worse over time!
Nuke Iran Now!
Are hanged nuked by those they tried to please.
FYJK
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.