Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Above My Pay Grade
An officer does not need probable cause or even reasonable suspicion to approach someone.

They do if they expect to exercise their authority qua authority.

You seem to have a great capacity to studiously ignore that salient point.

Why is that?

189 posted on 08/04/2015 4:31:56 PM PDT by papertyger (If the government doesn't obey the Constitution, what is treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

The officer had the right to approach him. He might have had some reasonable suspicion to question him, we don’t know. Regardless of that he certainly had the right to ask the guy to take his hand out of his pocket. Not 100% if he could order it, but once the guy refused and started acting so frantically, he certainly has reasonable suspicion and reason to believe the guy might be a danger.

The courts have given the police a great deal of lattitude when if comes to protecting their safety.


191 posted on 08/04/2015 4:37:48 PM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (Donald Trump: New York City Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson