No, see transcript. Netanyahu didn’t mention.
I said in post 55: Kerry testified even he hasn’t seen them. For once, I believe him. IMO, the “secret” side deals are a necessary component of Obama’s Iran Deal.
What I meant: I think NO ONE in Congress will see any or all of the side deals. Kerry had not read the side deals. He was “briefed” on them. Kerry said he does not have ACCESS to them-— and apparently doesn’t anticipate having access to them.
Kerry was taken aback when a congressman said that Susan Rice had seen them.
A plausible deniability thing? that’s between IAEA & Iran...no US involvement, wink, wink? Just wondering....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3318517/posts
Partial transcript:
KERRY: “No I haven’t seen it. I’ve been briefed on it. And –”
POE: “–But you haven’t read it, you haven’t seen it.”
KERRY: “No because it’s in the possession of the IAEA.”
POE: “Are you going to read it?”
KERRY: “We don’t have access to the actual agreement.”
POE: “But Secretary Rice has access to it, but you don’t have access to it –”
KERRY: “I don’t know about that.”
Thanks Thouworm....
You’re right the “secret” side deals would make or break the entire deal...which is why done separately and “protected” from the eyes of the public...especially our full court congress!
I heard Kerry speaking on this as i listened to a good portion of the hearing on the deal. I just couldn’t remember specifics...except Kerry was majorly on the defensive and frustrated that he even was being questioned.