Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So if we say we want Muslims to stand up against Islamic extremism but we won’t call it Islamic extremism, how will they know it’s Islamic extremism if we won’t even tell the truth about it?

Heck, it’s not even extremism, really. It is simply Muslims taking their religion very, very seriously and trying to walk in the footsteps of Muhammad. Now there is an extreme component to it, as some believe the time is now to wage Jihad and others believe that time will come when their Mahdi returns. But that’s just a matter of ‘when’, not ‘what’.

1 posted on 08/01/2015 9:21:32 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Whenifhow
*SIGH*
2 posted on 08/01/2015 9:22:49 PM PDT by null and void (If the government can't protect the Marines, how can we expect it to protect us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Somebody needs to explain to this clown that the Muslims will NOT respect us — for being weak.


3 posted on 08/01/2015 9:23:53 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow
Johnson responded, and explained that Islam “is about peace.”

This mutt is either completely delusional or an agent of Islam. Even Muslims don't believe that bullshit.

If Johnson's position 'wins', we are lost.

4 posted on 08/01/2015 9:26:29 PM PDT by Gritty (A citizenry that votes for an asshole is less deluded than one that votes for a messiah-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow
When Obama’s Administration “respects” Muslims/Islam, he is insulting everyone else.
6 posted on 08/01/2015 9:27:33 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Was watching the movie Fury the other day. If obama was president in 1940s he wouldn’t be declaring war against Germany and Japan so they won’t be offended.


8 posted on 08/01/2015 9:28:15 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Jeh? Rhymes with “meh”. Johnson is an appropriate name for this guy. He won’t call it ‘Islamic terrorism’, but we will.


11 posted on 08/01/2015 9:29:15 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow
We can't call a spade a spade because that would upset Soetoro. Same thing with muzzie extremist terrorism.
13 posted on 08/01/2015 9:32:24 PM PDT by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

The Feds during the Bush administration (circa 2006) along with the media decided that Islamic terrorism would not be called that anymore. That was about six months after the UK government decided to do so.


14 posted on 08/01/2015 9:34:59 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

I like this approach....(WAIT)

So, the next time a crazy fool shoots up a church, ‘THEY’ will be extra careful to not blame ALL Whites for the attack.

The next time some idiot fires a gun and kills an ‘innocent bystander’, ‘THEY’ will not claim that ALL law abiding gun owners are just murderers waiting for the chance to murder someone.

Still waiting for ‘OUR PEOPLE’ to start using the Supreme Court to demand a Concealed Carry Permit issued by one state is good in all.

That is the premise they used to shove gay marriage down our throats.

These present day wordsmiths are making Clintons ‘depends on the meaning of is’ look like 2nd grade material.


15 posted on 08/01/2015 9:36:01 PM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98)"IF Congress approval hangs around 15-20 % how come 90% get reelected?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

To be politically correct is to be delusional.


16 posted on 08/01/2015 9:37:09 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

We don’t have a chance with people like this in charge.


17 posted on 08/01/2015 9:37:45 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Jeh Johnson is a male version of the noxious Susan Rice, in other words a “Paid Liar” who thinks he is serving his president with honor and distinction.


19 posted on 08/01/2015 9:44:11 PM PDT by lee martell (The sag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

I swear, this article was sorta making me laugh . . . until I figured out that it WASN’T from the Onion!

Now words fail me.

Oldplayer


21 posted on 08/01/2015 9:53:12 PM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

But they have no problem calling people “Right Wing Extremists”


22 posted on 08/01/2015 9:55:00 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Sometimes I wonder how some of these people muster up enough brain functionality to remember to breath.


23 posted on 08/01/2015 9:56:07 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Also out of “respect” for the murdering Islamoterrorists too! Right chief? Morons!


25 posted on 08/01/2015 10:11:59 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Stop the DemocRATS' War On Babies! Vote conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Jeh Jerk Johnson. Another affirmative action a$$hole.


27 posted on 08/01/2015 11:00:00 PM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Let me see if I get this right. This Mohammed fellow kills four Marines and a Sailor, the administration says, though his name is Mohammed, the killings had nothing to do with him being Muslim. If it had nothing to do with religion, then what he did was cold blooded murder. Per this statement from the administration, what they are saying is: we must not offend cold blooded murderers?

Incredible. Just when you think you’ve heard it all.

Why isn’t there outrage, in congress and everywhere, over the obvious religious bias of this administration?


29 posted on 08/01/2015 11:28:02 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

If you want to respect Muslims so damned much, stop trying to cover up for their “courageous deeds for Alluh”. They’re proud of their “soldiers” and they celebrate every time their “soldiers” murder more Christians or Jews.


30 posted on 08/02/2015 12:07:12 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow
...Aspen Institute... ...respect for Muslims...

Not surprised at all to see those in close association with each other. They're both equally in opposition to the US, just for slightly different reasons.

32 posted on 08/02/2015 12:44:31 AM PDT by setha (It is past time for the United States to take back what the world took away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson