Settle down, little Danny. I’m not addressing what that operator did because there are conflicting stories. Irrespectively, of what you think you know, you are only half right in your assertions of “rights”. The operator should not fly over people and the only building he is allowed to fly over is his client’s house below the height restrictions established by local laws.
Put your pants back on little billy.
The rest of us are addressing the viewing of young girls in a state of undress and under no circumstances will you deflect that from being the topic we are debating.
Regardless of what you think your "rights" are, you fly your drone over my head or my house without permission and I'm bringing it down.
If this clown was flying his drone commercially without a AC/Section 333 exemption, or a SAC-EC, or a COA, then he's a danger to the community.
Flying for a hobby is one thing, but flying commercially is another matter entirely because the FAA controls commercial UAS, not the local laws.
Clowns like this guy are responsible for the loss of property during a brush fire recently in CA whose flight over the fire grounded the firefighting aircraft and for the near miss of two airliners over JFK.