Posted on 07/30/2015 2:37:11 PM PDT by Morgana
In the fourth and most startling undercover Planned Parenthood video from the Center for Medical Progress, Dr. Savita Ginde of Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains (PPRM) admits that about 10 percent of their second trimester babies are born intact before the abortion procedure is done.
CMP points out that since PPRM does not use digoxin or other feticide in its second trimester procedures, any intact deliveries before an abortion are potentially born-alive infants under federal law (1 USC 8).
Because PPRM does not use digoxin, this would mean women who are dilated, but have not had the abortion procedure, actually go into labor and deliverpotentially a live baby.
//
Digoxin injections, inserted into the womans abdomen to kill her baby before delivery, replaced partial-birth abortions after they were outlawed. Operation Rescue reports that late-term abortion doctor George Tiller pioneered this method:
The induction abortion with the use of digoxin injection was pioneered by late-term abortionist George R. Tiller of Wichita, Kansas, and is now widely used throughout the United States by the few abortionists who are willing to admit they do the late-term procedures. It has replaced the live partial birth abortion method since the Partial Birth Abortion Ban act was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in April, 2007.
But Dr. Ginde says, Sometimes, we get- if someone delivers before we get to see them for a procedure, then they are intact, but thats not what we go for (transcript, page 4).
Whether it is what they go for or not, if this happens even one time, it is now infanticide, which is exactly what Kermit Gosnell is in prison for. Gosnell, who killed babies born alive, is generally seen as an aberration in the abortion community, but this video shows Gosnell-like mentality within taxpayer-funded Planned Parenthood.
On the video, Dr. Ginde is seen discussing intact deliveries with a casual, callous tone:
Buyer: If you can kind of play around with that lower range I think, if the specimens are coming out more intact. So that, I guess, we will kind of get a first hand look at that today, later on. How many procedures are scheduled-When were talking about intact specimens, how many of those do you see?
Ginde: Intact specimens?
Buyer: Yes, within-whats your volume on an average Tuesday?
Ginde: With second tris? Anywhere as low as three up to seven.
Buyer: Ok, and so intact?
Ginde: Intact. So we do basically D&Es. Intact is less than ten percent.
Buyer: Ok. Less than ten percent. (Transcript, 2-3)
Infanticide is indisputably murder, and the abortion giant must be investigated thoroughly.
the reason Gosnell is in jail is because he’s a nobody from a tiny abortion mill. These folks are VERY well connected tycoons, buy I suspect we’ll might end up seeing videos of them doing the exact same things Gosnell sits in prison for now.
Will anything happen?
That’s exactly what it is leading to.
The 12th video is a born alive infant being killed.
Savages. Let’s kill them for their parts and take the whole “eye for an eye” thing to its fullest meaning.
“Oh my....is this leading to a video of Planned Parenthood killing live babies so they can sell fully developed body parts?
In my opinion, yes. Probably the last film will comtain either verbal evidence or video of the murder of a living, breathing child.
“I doubt these guys only had one copy. I would thing they distributed the videos widely anticipating the fight and shutdown attempts.”
They’re also educating those who are against infanticide in how to fight.
Yes, it’s murder, but the “justice “ department is under orders from militant feminazis to do nothing.
Babies now. Elderly soon. “undesirables” later.
I thought we eliminated the nazis?
“We have to elect the gov that gave his cash and passed legislation for this no matter what!”
Norm, you should take this logic to its conclusion.
Voting makes you complicit.
The information is at this link on IMAGYN; I’m unable to copy paste from that site:
“Its my belief that the distribution of these videos with no meaningful response on the part of the people and government of the United States will serve as a final conviction for this nation in the court of heaven.”
We voted for it.
“Will anything happen?”
You already know the answer.
thx I found it, it’s a shell company in a house that she no longer owns or lives in
Evil ghouls.
It does when you do it knowingly the guy you voted for is himself part of the problem.
Thats simple logic 101 stuff. If you feel bad about that, resolve to not repeat the mistake.
I know. Lions kill baby elephants slowly and horribly. The less lions the better imo.
>Thats exactly what it is leading to.
The 12th video is a born alive infant being killed.<
Oh I think it will be worse than that. These babies are alive when they’re murdered in the womb, and that’s been legal. I think we’re going to find out what their doing with their remains, and we’ll probably hit the floor when we do.
I remember that day rather well.
I was a college biology major then.
I thought, well, so they’re saying it’s OK to kill a kid in the first trimester.
Note that in the headline, which everyone forgets: THAT’S THE WAY IT WAS SOLD. ONLY THE FIRST 3 MONTHS, WHEN “It’s just a mass of cells”....
As PP always likes to say.
Except anyone who knew Ontogeny (umm, millions of first year biology students) would know that a) it’s a human and b) it isn’t a mass of cells by 12 weeks.
You’d fail Human Anat and Phys if you thought such a thing.
But that’s how it was sold.
Oddly they forgot to mention Doe v. Bolton, adjudicated the same day. Which extended it to...well, anytime up to natural birth.
Legalized murder of the innocents. Even in 1973, most people would have rebelled at that idea.
That is not where I got the info, but thanks for that link.
Sickening Vultures.
Never put anything past a slimeball who would reach inside a woman’s body and kill her child. Once they are okay with that, then killing a child who has been born alive is nothing to them.
You can blame all this on seven Supreme Court justices who had an agenda and searched for a case to fulfill it. BLACKMUN, BURGER, DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL, and POWELL are the slobs who engineered the abortion decision.
The decision was and is unconstitutional in that it violates the 10th and 11th Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Blackmun’s decision basically says that since one state has full access to abortion and one other state has partial access, all the other states must go along.
The 10th Amendment says that unless something is specifically mentioned in the Constitution, or has been yielded by the states to the federal government, it belongs to the states. The 11th Amendment basically states that one state cannot sue another state for equity within the law. Those two things wipe out Roe vs Wade to any logical person.
“Its my belief that the distribution of these videos with no meaningful response on the part of the people and government of the United States will serve as a final conviction for this nation in the court of heaven.”
I agree. God is giving each of us a clear choice and call to action as he did to the children of Israel many times in the Old Testament. I fear our collective response will not be well received on the judgment day. How many of our political leaders have spoken out? Legislation can be written and passed in a day, forcing the POTUS to sign or veto. Nothing is happening. God has our nation’s answer. So soon after the recent Supreme Court ruling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.