[detective]

This is a good short article on the amount of data tampering and fraud committed by so called "climate scientists".

The is no such thing as "the science behind global warming". There are just time series projections using fraudulent data.

[HarleyLady27]

...being lied to again....is this all our government does is lie?????

[Hostage]

If there was honesty in Congress, there would be investigative hearings to get to the bottom of the fraud.

[InterceptPoint]

I know it's very unusual to post pictures of yourself on FR. But I'm making an exception today so that I can post this picture of me that was snapped by my wife as I was reading this article. 😎

[HiTech RedNeck]

“The biggest component of this fraud is making up data. Almost half of all reported US temperature data is now fake. They fill in missing rural data with urban data to create the appearance of non-existent US warming.”

Well yeah... impute the thermal behavior of notorious heat islands to the hick sticks, and you will see some interesting phenomena... all of which was dreamed up in mendacious heads.

[Calvin Locke]

When listening to Joe Bastardi every week, he constantly mentions that the European computer model for up coming US weather is better than the US model. Heck, I think the Japanese model is better too.

I'm guessing the numbnutts at NOAA don't update their model because it would mean that their AGW religion is wrong.

[MarchonDC09122009]

I agree, this was and excellent AGW article.
Unfortunate that it won’t get the coverage it should by the MSM.
Its very disturbing that the 1200+ surface weather station’s temperature data is being manipulated to fit the global warming religious movement.
It’s also insane that the majority of weather stations do not adhere to correct siting rules that the government established to ensure temperature data is not skewed higher due to man made heat sources, for instance.
Anthony Watt weather station survey report:
http://mobile.wnd.com/2007/11/44629/

[sima_yi]

The difference between real scientists and "climate scientists":

Real scientists adjust their models to fit the data.
"Climate scientists" adjust the data to fit their models.

[PATRIOT1876]

Algore says:

“I still gotcher thumb!

Pay NO attention to facts or reality. You must believe MY science. Not the old fashioned Science of the past”

[glorgau]

It’s like the employment stats - they are “seasonally adjusted”.

[MarchonDC09122009]

Actual survey results on the 1200 US weather stations indicate 70% do not meet gov’t site requirements.
Incredible..see pictures of the temperature measurement stations and corresponding data results, ie: stations near heat sources have higher recorded temperature measurements.

Bad science in the name of public policy fraud, ie: carbon credit scam, and green energy corruption.

http://www.surfacestations.org/

[StACase]

Here are the two links from above:

GisTemp

Wayback GisTemp