Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGruff

And if he did run for a third term, the RINO’s would just be RINO’s and let him. Make absolutely zero effort to enforce law. They would continue to do everything that is counterproductive to their own cause and lose the election. Afterwards they’d respect obama’s third term as though nothing wrong had happened.

And above all, those self righteous arrogant POS RINO’s would just think: “SCREW AMERICA!!!”


69 posted on 07/28/2015 7:24:29 AM PDT by redfreedom (All it takes for evil to win is for good people to do nothing - that's how the left took over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: redfreedom; Jim Robinson; Kartographer; Buckeye McFrog; nathanbedford
And if he did run for a third term, the RINO’s would just be RINO’s and let him. Make absolutely zero effort to enforce law

What law is that?

The XXII Amendment may be the worst drafted amendment in history (although there is stiff competition). It does not even say, as it should have, "The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

The first couple of times you look at it, it seems clear enough: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice...".

But the Constitution makes no provision for something called a "Presidential election".

The Amendment could have easily said, "a person who has served as President for 2922 days shall thereafter be ineligible to the office", conforming itself to the language of Article II and Amendment XII.

"Being nominated", "Running for President", and "Presidential elections" are all outside the Constitutional framework.

So, what does the XXII Amendment actually ban or prohibit? Upon whom does it act?

Does it mean that a State Legislature may not, in its chosen process for appointing electors, allow a twice-President to be considered? Does it mean that an elector, once appointed, may not vote for a twice-President? Does it mean that Congress, meeting in the Constitutionally-designed special electoral vote counting session, may not count votes naming a twice-President, even though Amendment I makes clear that the House and the Senate may make their own rules without interference?

I'm afraid that, as drafted, XXII can't withstand attack from a determined enemy, which may well be what we are dealing with here.

134 posted on 07/29/2015 4:37:09 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson