Skip to comments.
Martin O’Malley: ‘Ban Sale Of Assault Weapons,’ Launch ‘National Gun Registry’
breitbart.com ^
| 7/26/2015
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 07/27/2015 10:02:18 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: rktman
The obsequious pantywaist should stick to what he does best, groveling before militant leftists.
21
posted on
07/27/2015 10:36:13 AM PDT
by
Yankee
(My President is a Fascist)
To: rktman
To: Yankee
Groveling before militant Leftists is exactly what he’s doing here; trying to carve out a niche in a Democrat race being dominated by Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.
To: rktman
I like when the gun grabbers act horrified when they show a gun that fires a bullet every time you pull the trigger. That would make a revolver an “Assault Weapon”.
24
posted on
07/27/2015 11:03:26 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
...called on Congress to ban "the sale of assault weapons" and "[establish] a national gun registry." He also said it is time to "[increase] inspections" on gun shops and mandate that gun owners lock up their guns in their homes.
25
posted on
07/27/2015 11:07:08 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
To: Campion
Even Canada junked their national gun registry after it cost billions and didn’t solve or prevent a single crime. Cost doesn't matter and the purpose is not to solve crime, it is to confiscate.
With a national registry, after the Social Security Administration puts your name on the NICS prohibited persons list because you asked for help with your checkbook, they can then go to your door and ask for all of your weapons by make and serial number.
26
posted on
07/27/2015 11:21:56 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: rktman
He needs to apologize for even thinking such a thought... grovel O’Malley - grovel...
27
posted on
07/27/2015 12:13:55 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(They are not undocumented and they are not immigrants. They are illegal aliens. Lurkinnamloomin)
To: rktman
No "assault weapons" were used at Lafayette. Commie "one note" O'Malley just can't help himself. Ban. Ban. Ban. Go away jackass. The MENTALLY ILL shooter at Lafayette LIED on his Form 4473 question 11f. He HAD been involuntary committed to a mental institution. The NICS system failed to detect that he lied, so the government is the cause of the failure. Further, when valid NICS denials occurs, the government never follows up. It is a waste of money. Pointless harassment. Real criminals aren't buying firearms where NICS would catch them anyway.
Not to omit the "gun registry" BS. Hitler would approve. He called for the same thing before confiscation and genocide. Mao did the same thing. Adolf O'Malley has a nice ring.
28
posted on
07/27/2015 1:05:05 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: Renegade
Let me guess, any firearm would be considered a “assault weapon.”
29
posted on
07/28/2015 10:11:00 AM PDT
by
matt04
To: rktman; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
30
posted on
07/29/2015 12:00:52 AM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson