Might I make a suggestion: quit worrying about every single thing said by Hindraker, Goldberg, Williamson, whoever....none of them are running. Only focus on whether or not they make some valid points. And all of them have made some valid points. Who cares if their motivations are bad, or if they make some invalid points. Just disregard those.
And I've written about Trump, the good and the bad, for years. The bad has been his rather routine leftist leanings. He went left of W. Bush and Walker over the weekend. That's a damned valid criticism. I could care less what Hindrakers motives are.
Actually, this is the first time I have ever commented on anything said by Hinderaker.
In any event, what you’re advocating is to not take issue with anything written by a pundit as long as they are generally espousing what you consider the “correct” position.
When a pundit inflates a misread or misunderstood statement into an entire blog post, one that has now been posted at least twice on FR, it should be ignored because, after all, his heart’s in the right place.
We’ll have to agree to disagree on that.