Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

I don’t see this as a problem. I see it as a sign of greater *honesty*

With the fall of TV, magazines and other commercial media, comes a great liberation from advertisement. In the 1960s, ‘70’s, and ‘80’s, children were bombarded with “sex sells” advertisements, convincing many that all their peers were hypersexual, but they were sexual failures because they weren’t. Which could be cured if you will buy our product.

But there is only a tiny fraction of that propagandistic barrage of advertisement left on the Internet.

Certainly broad segments of the Internet are about pornography. But porn is just “the end result”. It tells you nothing about how to get there. How to attract someone sexually. What you must look like and what you have to do.

Importantly, look at who is talking.

The “perverted left” want children to be perverts as well, sexually active long before they are physically, intellectually, or emotionally.

As far as Rush Limbaugh goes, he has some distorted views as well, in past attributing sex as the cause of most human activity.

But the bottom line to all of this is likely that children today are not as neurotic about sex as were children just a generation ago. When someone asks if they have had sex, they have no compelling reason to lie and say yes.


14 posted on 07/23/2015 4:03:34 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

It’s viewed as a problem by the “Progressives”


16 posted on 07/23/2015 4:13:13 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson