Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave W

Or not!


153 posted on 07/23/2015 8:28:40 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: GilGil
You consider "Or not" an appropriate response? I'm not surprised. It's always easy to spot those going blindly into delusional thinking - that simply is not a response that leads me to believe you know what you are writing about.

Your belief is nothing more than a silent scream in the dark, hoping someone will hear it. And I understand that. But it is also not wise to be foolish.

If your theory that Trump is electable, I would like to see your plan on how he gets to 270 electoral votes. Can you write clearly and intelligently on what Trump needs to do to win from a strategic point of view? Or are you going to give me two or three word responses, which quite frankly is embarrassing.

What states can Trump win when he splits the republican vote? What states do you think will be easiest for him to win - what is his path to victory.

I suggest studying the 1968 and 1992 elections. Yes, I know 1968 and 1992, the US was a different country, but both can give you valuable insight as to how Trump can win or lose as a third party candidate. Then I would peruse every election cycle and see how many third party candidates won not only the presidency, but other federal offices, such as senator or representative. Investigate why that person won and governor's races can be instructive, too. It's valuable to think this through and how this can happen. I'm always available if you have questions or get stuck. Good luck.

154 posted on 07/23/2015 9:51:30 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson