Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o
Notice that this hearing is not directly on the recusal motion, which is directed to Petersen. He has to "recuse himself" in the ordinary scheme of the process, and if he did or does, that decision can be appealed. This process was used to get Judge Lester off the Zimmerman case. Lester denied the recusal motion, O'Mara appealed, and Lester was ordered by the appellate court to recuse himself.

This hearing relates to Broden's judicial ethics complaint. For what it's worth, even an unfavorable decision from the State Commission on Judicial Conduct does not force recusal. The recusal decision can be affected by, but is not determined by the outcome of the hearing before the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

6 posted on 07/22/2015 2:04:20 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; don-o

I see don’t0 is still trying to push the rope uphill.

Texas judicial is not quite the same as FLA. Its doubtful the Dallas ambulance chaser attorney Clinton Broden is going accomplish anything more than milk Clendennen absolutely dry (in Texas an unsuccessful plaintiff pays ALL court costs) and pissoff more judges.

But hey, they need to keep on keepin on, its very entertaining to watch idiots spin in the wind.


13 posted on 07/22/2015 2:26:19 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson