[Bender2]

I expect The Truth to do as well as Redford's Lions for Lambs did in 2007- It opened to negative reviews and disappointing box office receipts. It still hasn't earned back it negative cost.

Being a W-Bashing flick, the mainstream reviews may not be as negative but the paying public that generates huge box office for today's films (mostly 12-14 petulant boys who just entered puberty and love doing it over and over again) will not beat a path to its door. Much less pay to get in the door.

[tanknetter]

This is where new media and social media will play an important role (yet again) in debunking the revisionism. The story here boils down to this:

Rather’s story was based on a document typed in a font that didn’t yet exist (Times New Roman superscript) on a machine that didn’t yet exist (word processor) that showed signs of having been run through a photocopier for a couple dozen generations to make it look old.

End. Of. Story.