You probably know this, but condescension generally reflects worse on the flinger, than on the target. Keep it up, by all means.
-- Please show us an adjudicated case where a Judge / JP was convicted of a crime of Official Oppression where the charge was setting too high a bail (without personal gain.) --
You are the one who claims personal gain is required. It is incumbent on you to show authority for YOUR propositions.
Another of which is that a JP can set bail on a whim, such as "doesn't like bikers."
Another of which is that the legal standard for probable cause is "He just had to think he might be right." My contention is that individualized accusations have to present, too. But you never did answer my question on that point, poseur.
Indeed. Thanks for your informative well written posts.
This is idiocy.
Rule #14, which I have ignored at my peril: “Never Debate Law With Non-Lawyers!”
Please send me the eventual notice of the judge’s conviction of these heinous crimes you allege he has committed, or an apology when this is settled.