[detective]

“John Paul II was rather unlike Francis in his vehement rejection of Liberation Theology (as memorialized in that iconic image of the Holy Father wagging his finger at Fr. Ernesto Cardenal on the tarmac in Nicaragua), the foundation upon which both men's social convictions rests is the same; namely, the post-conciliar model wherein the Social Kingship of Christ has been supplanted by the so-called “primacy of the human person.””

This is what the article said. It did not say “JPII was a bad Pope”.

The article was incorrect in saying Pope Francis has taken JPII’s concepts too far. Pope Francis’s concepts are strict Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist with a little Castro and Hugo Chavez thrown in.

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

It did not say “JPII was a bad Pope”.

The article says that "apostasy" is the logical conclusion of JPII's pontificate.

"...it is more obvious now than ever just how much [Francis] and John Paul II have in common. In fact, I would argue that the aforementioned papal shenanigans in Bolivia provides solid evidence that Francis is simply carrying the failings of Pope John Paul II closer and closer to their logical conclusion; all out apostasy."