traderrob6’s assessment is valid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet#2006_definition
The prevailing criteria for a planet was changed by a ‘quorum’ of 232 out of 10,000 on the justification that dozens of planets would exist if the definition wasn’t changed.
IMO they’re going with a definition which identifies 8 planets because they can be counted using one’s fingers. Should we now worry about Jupiter being renamed Chikn?
For one thing, it shows 9 planets.
WRONG!
For another thing it shows WHITE PEOPLE.
WRONG!
Lastly, it shows that there are only 2 sexes, not the 53 gender identifications we all will be forced to accept.
WRONG!