I actually agree with you here, but I have a different take on it, hence my issue with the article.
I don' agree with the article's premise that following the rules the problem, I believe the entire game itself needs to be replaced with an entirely new one which favors our outlook and nature, as was done by the founders.
They realized that they could not live with the current system and invented a new one, which we must do again.
I understand. The problem is that it doesn’t matter what the system is if one side doesn’t play by the rules.