[xzins]

So, you admit that was not the end of the interchange between Trump and the interviewer?

Inter: 'Suppose a woman is pregnant and is not in any of those exception categories, and she chooses to have an abortion.'

T: It depends when..it depends when..it depends when...but...but...but...the answer is...if it's not in those...R: ...(earlier - chooses to have an abortion)..should she..(something)...early in pregnancy excuse me...if it's not in those...I'm pro-life...Mark, very simple. I'm pro-life.

at the 'but..but...but' he's being talked over by the reporter (which generates the 'excuse me'.)

So, he was starting this thought: "It depends when..but...if it's not in those..." How was Trump going to finish that oft interrupted statement? I think it was: "It depends when, but if it's not in those categories, THEN IT'S NOT PRO-LIFE."

[SoConPubbie]

Xzins,

You are arguing over only one aspect of that conversation.

Frankly, his exception for Rape, Incest and Life of the Mother should have been enough to convince you that he is not Pro-Life.

Partially Pro-Life, yes, but enough for a Christian, No.

[onyx]

I think it was: "It depends when, but if it's not in those categories, THEN IT'S NOT PRO-LIFE."

Thank you (again) dearest xzins.

I happen to agree with you.

Backed traced some of the posts, but stopped when I saw that the falsification-troll-ankle biter was at again.

I salute Mr. Trump for not backing down to the entrapment MSM and their hideous reporters/writers. I've started to TIVO his interviews for purposes of accuracy.

I'm grateful he has made ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION the national topic.

Just look at two of his fellow candidates who are NOT criticizing him: TED CRUZ & BEN CARSON