It appears you failed to grasp the part about this being the numbers taken from the existing records.
What you are arguing is that whoever wrote down the records must have been lying. That's a pretty pathetic argument.
So were the numbers from the 1860 census. Link
What you are arguing is that whoever wrote down the records must have been lying. That's a pretty pathetic argument.
What I am saying is that the numbers make no sense at all. So which is more pathetic? My questioning them or you believing them?