Posted on 07/06/2015 8:45:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway
SNIP
He says “many fabulous people come in from Mexico and our country is better for it.”
He then calls the United States “a dumping ground for Mexico.”
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
No contradiction at all. He’s saying we are better off for the “many fabulous people who have come over” but those Mexicans who have come here illegally do not represent the best of their society, and have brought high incidence of crime, and dependence with them. Keep trying to discredit the truth, MSM.
Trump is Pat Buchanan with 8 billion dollars! He is wupping the media’s ass and the GOPs ass and no one can stop him because he has MONEY. AND HE KNOWS WHEN TO USE IT, HOW TO USE IT AND.....when to let the little pansy media and wimpy kinder gentler compassionate republicans give him more and more free publicity
Then why does he want them to stay? And how is that possible when the Mexican government only ships their worst citizens herE?
Buchanan never got elected to anything. Buchanan never shipped jobs overseas. And Buchanan was a conservative in the past. Buchanan can write a coherent article. Trump is nothing like Buchanan. little pansy media and wimpy kinder gentler compassionate republicans
You gotta be kidding. Trump acts like a hysterical reality show chick. Have you ever seen a real man that acts like him? John Wayne? Ronald Reagan? He acts the opposite of them. You think he'd get a testosterone patch if he was going to run for president.
“No. 1, he has no intention of building the ... wall”
How do you “know” so much Nick?
Trump is taking on China and Mexico, the rest of the field are just saying....AH TRUMP IS RIGHT ABOUT THAT BUT..TRUMP IS RIGHT ABOUT THAT BUT.....
the only question is will he quit like Perot?
Trump for President sounds the best so far by far.
Libtard reporter publishing just how many
Mexican border crashers work for T-rump as
hotel maids and golf course laborers in...5...
...4.....3.....2.....1
Trump is using the right as patsies. And he's done it before.
He is never going to run, because he's not going to reveal he has much less money than he claims.
You can't trust a person who is a manipulator and a lair. Hello: scorpion, frog. Clinton.
Trump is speaking the truth that others in the field will not speak.... that says a lot about all who are in play for POTUS.
Yes, Trump is nothing like Buchanan. That’s a good thing. Buchanan has done little in his life EXCEPT write articles, and not that many of them have been very coherent as of late. Trump hasn’t written a lot of articles. He’s been too busy making money and creating jobs.
Any proof of that? He sends his manufacturing work to China, Bangladesh, Mexico. He employs mostly illegals on construction projects. I'd like to see any proof that he's created jobs. He doesn't have a very good track record with the truth.
Nick, you might be right about him ultimately leaving the race. Maybe he is playing the right for patsies. But maybe not. It is true that he has a history of flip-flopping on political issues, and supporting Democrats, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that he can’t be trusted at this point in time.
An alternative explanation of the change in his political leanings, is that in the past, his focus and energy were on business. That was his main interest and, while he wasn’t shy about giving his opinions, he really didn’t spend all that much time studying or thinking about political issues that seriously. Over time his interest and thinking on political issues has grown and developed. At least it’s possible.
People are confused and cannot make distinctions. The Democrats want people to be confused so they can play their Alinsky tactics. Let me lay down what is the border problem:
If you think about it, every Republican candidate has made reference to the havoc the invasion has created throughout America. We all are paying a big price for it and it is something we do not want to stick our heads in the sand to make nice with the Hispanic vote. Instead, we must make a distinction. There is the Hispanic population who has played by the rules and wants to be good citizens. Then, there are those who do not play by the rules and make everyone’s lives miserable, including the good Hispanic population who plays by the rules.
Those who cross the Mexican border illegally have failed the litmus test for being willing to live by the rule of law. They have a cultural deficit which is willing to violate social norms and commit any kind of crime to suit their needs. The rule of law comes from those with a culture for it. The illegal Mexican Border crossers show their true colors when they cross our border illegally. We should make sure a distinction is made between the good law abiding legal border crossers and the illegal border crossers. The good Hispanic population who has played by the rules wants to be good citizens. They play by the legal process. Those who do not play by the rules makes everyone’s lives miserable, including the good Hispanic population. They have shown their lawlessness does not stop at the Mexican Border. Their lawlessness continues wherever they go.
The trick the Democrats play is they put the good Hispanic and the bad Hispanic in the same bucket and say the Republicans are calling all of them a bad bucket. No! The lawbreakers, who do not play by the rule of law are the bad bucket. The rule of law comes from those with a culture for it. Republicans must say to the good Hispanics that they will support them because they have a culture that represents the best of America. To keep lawlessness out of the neighborhoods, Republicans should emphasize they want strong measures to control our borders and extradite the lawbreakers. Those who break our laws should be punished for it with extradition that is paid for by the lawbreaker. That will protect our neighborhoods and the good Hispanics will be glad for it. They don’t want these scofflaws any more that any of us.
If I remember correctly, he also included those from other countries as well. Lord, have mercy, did any of these pukes even listen to his speech before jumping on the anti-Trump wagon? I’m not saying I will or would support him, but, he is absolutely 100% correct on this issue.
“Your defending a Democrat who has lied about everything.”
And you use Alynsky dirty pool tactics to lie about Trump on every Trump thread. Or should I say you are an expert at the sin of omission, a trick you like to pull, such as what you posted (actually what you didn’t post) here. You are the male equivalent of Rosemary Woods. Where are the missing words?
“(BTW Trump has been bashing Bush)”
“And Trump said he felt bad about it.”
You aren’t at all up to date. Trump has doubled down on Jeb Bush and is going after him big-time in response to Bush’s own attacks on Trump. May the best man win, and it will definitively not be Bush.
Why are you supporting a liberal?
Trump was never a conservative, and never claimed to be.
He endorsed Romney in 2012.
He pretended to tun as a Republican.
He said he had some huge revelation about Obama, then he didn't have it, which made all the Obama critics look silly, and it distracted from Obama's failures.
He is in the trashy reality TV industry, which is against traditional U.S. values.
He doesn't believe anyone should be able to criticize Muslims.
He wants to ban the confederate flag.
He "identifies as a Republican.
He believes illegals should be kept in the U.S./a>
He's known to be untrustworthy over and over again.
So why do you push the Trump/Bush/Christie/Graham/Romney axis as "conservative." They are not conservative.
“you ever seen a real man that acts like him? John Wayne? Ronald Reagan? He acts the opposite of them. You think he’d get a testosterone patch if he was going to run for president.”
Trump is a lot more of a testosterone filled man than certain Freepers here on these threads, present company excluded, I’m sure. /s. Trump has cajones.
“He employs mostly illegals on construction projects.”
There you go again, slandering Trump again. Maybe you will be on his who to sue for defamation next list, lol.
I would welcome him suing me. Time for discovery.
He's a real estate developer. Who do you think is working on his construction site.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.