>>I disagree, they want to sacrifice humans to appease their false gods, THAT IS REGRESSIVE when compared to what this country used to stand for.
Well, good luck with getting them to accept Regressive as their name. Not every supervillain is stupid enough to name his minions The Legion of Doom. Most of them just call them the Civilian Defense Corps or Police Department. I live in the real world, not the isolated world of the conservative internet.
Getting THEM to accept the name has nothing to do with it, what I am saying is that WE should stop calling them progressives. They are not leading in the way of progress. If they started calling themselves the angels of mercy I don’t think we would agree with them on that, I don’t think we should agree with them on progressive either.
By the way, you don’t have to agree with them on their being progressive to live in the real world. They don’t call us conservatives as a compliment, to them it is an insult to call someone conservative. We need to call ourselves by a better name, I just don’t know what it should be at this point. We should not appear to be against progress, we just need to stop appearing to agree that these people who call themselves progressives represent progress, they most certainly DON’T. They represent willful ignorance, mendacity and pretty well the exact opposite of what they claim to represent. One of the primary tools of the left is the control of language and we need to fight them tooth and nail on that front. Referring to them as progressives, even with disdain, is falling into their trap. Allowing them to get away with dropping the term “global warming” and using “climate change” instead is also falling into their trap. Everytime they say climate change we should ask them if by that they mean global warming and if they say yes then ask them why they stopped SAYING global warming. If they are silly enough to say no then ask them what exactly do they mean, then laugh in their faces. I believe one of the main reasons they have gained so much ground is that we have ceded them control of the language. They pretend that words mean only what THEY say they mean, even though only a very few at the top could pass an eighth grade English exam from 1955. We have even let them get away with saying, “A woman’s right to choose”. Anytime someone says that you should ask,”Right to choose what?” It sounds terrible to be against a woman’s right to choose but it doesn’t sound quite so bad to be against a woman’s right to choose to kill an unborn child. Why don’t we ever hear of a man’s right to choose? Doesn’t a man have a choice about anything?