Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Here is the problem.

To win in a civil case, plaintiff must show LIABILITY and DAMAGES.

Judge threw out on liability grounds. Had he not, what were plaintiff’s damages, a new front door and one day’s house rental?

City probably already fixed the door!

Case is a non-starter.


71 posted on 07/04/2015 7:49:42 PM PDT by Crystal Palace East (90% of MSM is lies, except the National Enquirer, of course :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Crystal Palace East

The issue is not that there was minor damage, there was a direct “intentional infliction of emotional distress”, excessive use of force, false arrest, etc.

The cops were liable for the damage and IIED, etc. The judge did a cover up for the cops. That’s how the game is played against the weak.

A jury would have creamed the city and police, and you know that.

Again, this is Nevada where nothing is as it seems, and corruption goes unpunished as long as Harry Reid is around.


83 posted on 07/04/2015 11:25:47 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (madmax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson