Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
A work stoppage isn't an uprising?

Ending slavery was an economic sanction, one which was hoped would shut things down in the South.

It didn't matter. Lincoln had no authority over the states in secession, and those were the states to which the proclamation applied. ...governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed... and that consent had been revoked.

141 posted on 07/03/2015 3:20:17 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
Lincoln had no authority over the states in secession, and those were the states to which the proclamation applied.

Maybe, maybe not. But he certainly had authority to deal with areas in a state of insurrection. And he used that authority.

143 posted on 07/03/2015 3:34:36 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe
A work stoppage isn't an uprising?

Not by any definition I'm aware of.

Ending slavery was an economic sanction, one which was hoped would shut things down in the South.

True.

It didn't matter. Lincoln had no authority over the states in secession, and those were the states to which the proclamation applied.

As President of the United States - all the states, those rebelling and those not - he certainly did.

145 posted on 07/03/2015 3:43:41 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson