Posted on 06/30/2015 6:52:54 PM PDT by ConservativeTeen
Over the weekend, Fox News anchor Julie Banderas gave a pretty passionate defense of gay marriage in response to a viewer question about why the American people shouldn’t be able to vote on it.
Banderas said, “I’m a married woman. I have… a ring on my finger. I never asked anyone to vote on whether or not I had the right to do this.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Just so you know, Civil War era Rep. John Bingham was the main author of Section 1 of 14th Amendment. And Bingham had clarified in the congressional record that most of the constitutional “privileges or immunities” indicated in Section 1 of that amendment are those mentioned in the Bill of Rights (BoR) that the states amended to the Constitution as evidenced by the excerpt below.
"Mr. Speaker, that the scope and meaning of the limitations imposed by the first section, fourteenth amendment of the Constitution may be more fully understood, permit me to say that the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as contradistinguished from citizens of a State, are chiefly defined in the first eight amendments to the Constitution of the United States." — John Bingham, Appendix to the Congressional Globe (See middle part of 2nd column.)
Although a small number of privileges and immunities are not in the Bill of Rights but elsewhere in the Constitution, some people evidently think that the Constitution’s privileges and immunities are something different from the BoR.
And if Bingham’s using the rights enumeranted in the BoR isn’t a big enough clue that 14A applies only rights enumerated to the Constitution by the states to the states then please consider the following.
Bingham had also clarified that 14A applies only those rights which the states amend the Constitution to expressly protect to the states, not fictitious rights like abortion and gay marriage which activist justices found in the Constitution using their “magic glasses.”
“Mr. Speaker, this House may safely follow the example of the makers of the Constitution and the builders of the Republic, by passing laws for enforcing all the privileges and immunities of the United States as guaranteed by the amended Constitution and expressly enumerated in the Constitution [emphasis added].” —John Bingham, Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 42nd Congress, 1st Session. (See lower half of third column.)
The bottom line is that activist justices have no fear of perverting the Constitution because they are probably very confident that the corrupt Senate is not going work with the corrupt House to impeach them and remove them from the bench.
The 17th Amendmnet needs to disappear, and corrupt senators and activist justices along with it.
LOL...:)
yep...if you notice, theres alot of women who are attracted to gay men..and some i knew over the years all admitted to me that they got turned on by it. Bizarre
We would be lots better off if the vote was taken away from women. If we got rid of 19th Amendment and while we are at it no voting rights for trannies like Bruce-whatever and mouthy gays
LOL...I guess I can understand... but then, I’m a woman and well, I am glad my hubby is smart. :) we wouldn’t have much bacon if not .. :)
He is a great father and provider. :)
I hate this tablet because it is making me sound for more serious then I mean...plus I cent stop this mosquito biting my arm !
Post of the day!
Please tell me that is not true. I cried at Brownback
Mountain...but I cared about their feelings...Hollywood is good that way... crafty...
Their physical intersection was revolting!
Yes, you’’re right Semper!
It would take too long to explain on this autvorrect tablet.. but you have made me laugh often, a.b. :)
I remember having a blood test and having to jump through a few hoops in order to marry.
Can homosexual siblings marry?
Unlike other isms, humanism is thought to be a good thing.
Good looking bodies and faces are a dime a dozen but the hardest part is finding one that has a brain and can think logically. My proof? Just watch Waters World.
Dana Perino? MMMMMM! If I were not married and she were not married and I were about 150 years younger....I still would not stand a chance but a guy can dream. I am too stunned by her looks to notice whether she is a social revolutionary barbarian. If she is, don’t tell me!
Mammy was the greatest arbiter of social manners and moral obligations in the history of the US. “Oh, Mr. Rhett! You are baaaaaad!” “T’ain’t fittin’. It just t’ain’t fittin.” Not that Miss Melly was any slouch but there was only one Mammy.
Dog lovers and their dogs? Lance and Bruce, their dog Bowser and Bertha Bull Dyke and Linda Lipstick as a fivesome demanding a Church wedding at St. Patrick’s in NYC, or analogous Bible churches or Lubavitcher synagogues?
With all those “gay””divorces” your local judges must wield a mean crowbar to put such arrangements asunder.
The lights are on but nobody is home.
She is an idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.