Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfflier

Agreed. Not that the two were called competing against each other, but imagine if the F-20 had been picked instead of the F-16. There is no way the smaller F-20 would be able to carry all the stuff the F-16 has.


70 posted on 06/30/2015 2:15:54 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: USNBandit
I know the F-20 was independently entered as a competitor in the LWF program. I'm not sure anyone in USAF procurement took that seriously.

Don't get me wrong the T-38/F-5 airframe is very capable and nimble. But, like you said, it's a 1950's design that had already maxed out it's growth potential.

It is a tribute to the F-16/F-17 design teams that their respective planes evolved into domineering 4th generation fighters.

73 posted on 06/30/2015 3:25:35 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson