Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein
Well, it’s one of the reasons. But even the New York tenements which are rent-stabilized have been updated to reflect the wealth of NYC. It’s ridiculous to walk into a tenement building on the east side and see the gorgeous appliances, handsome wood floors and the inevitable exposed brick wall. And the rickety fire escape out the window! Even if we got rid of rent-stabilization, rents would still be out of control.

Rents would be cheaper for all who don't have rent-stabilization.

NYC needs to be 100% market rate.

7 posted on 06/30/2015 9:39:44 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

We once went on a tour of Manhattan. Saw a bunch of brownstones that had been burnt out, boarded up, exterior in place, not renovated. I asked our tour guide about them. He said they were all rent controlled and it cost far more to repair them than they would get on rent, especially when taxes were considered. It was suspected that more than once the property owner actually had the building burnt, but they couldn’t prove it.


8 posted on 06/30/2015 10:33:19 AM PDT by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson