Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dware
100% incorrect. The 2 are mutually inclusive

That would only be true if church wedding were the only way to get married. There are numerous other paths to marital bliss for the sodomites. Not saying that they won't come after Christian churches, I'm just saying that it doesn't of necessity follow.

23 posted on 06/30/2015 8:04:03 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: pgkdan
“This newly minted federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage can and should peaceably coexist with longstanding constitutional and statutory rights, including the rights to free exercise of religion and freedom of speech,”

That would only be true if church wedding were the only way to get married.

This "newly minted federal constitutional right" CANNOT, by nature, coexist with the right to free exercise of religion and freedom of speech", now that deviant marriage is a "civil right". As I've mentioned previously, this SCOTUS opinion has placed deviant sexual behavior on the same level as race. I don't care who or what the church is, if they are sued for discrimination based on a civil right, they will lose.

The deviants will not be happy using an alternate method of marriage. Now that it is a civil right, they will go for the churches. The first church to turn down a deviant couple will be sued, persecuted and more.

28 posted on 06/30/2015 8:28:16 AM PDT by dware (Yeah, so? What are we going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson