Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: odawg

He did not allow her to distract with the interacial question because it would be accepting a narrative that it had anything to do with same sex. It does not, and people know it.

He could have made her a fool for asking but was gracious enough not to waste the time.
He gets on these interviews and he talks to the people not the interviewer.
That is what he does so right in these situations.


17 posted on 06/29/2015 10:42:45 AM PDT by right way right (Disclaimer: Not a prophet but I have a pretty good record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: right way right

Agree, completely! Thanks for that post :-)


23 posted on 06/29/2015 10:47:15 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: right way right
He did not allow her to distract with the interracial question because it would be accepting a narrative that it had anything to do with same sex. It does not, and people know it.

Whenever I get this 'what if...interracial' question, I always reply with 'what if the Supreme Court unanimously declared that the sky was green'? Then what? Settled law? No recourse? We start rewriting every book in the world that is now wrong? That question usually takes care of people who want to play 'what if' with me.

59 posted on 06/29/2015 12:02:16 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (It is the nature of liberals to pervert whatever they touch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson