[ansel12]

The government ordering churches to baptize people on demand, forced to allow Muslims and atheists to take communion, to marry people that have nothing to do with them, as though they are public marriage businesses, to perform marriages that are against their religion, or where the couple don’t meet their requirements, we are no where near that.

[dsm69]

I agree that this may not happen immediately, but in a few years there is nothing stopping the 5 justices who said fags can marry from also gutting the First Amendment Freedons of Religion, Speech and Assembly.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3305357/posts

.......Of course there’s nothing honest about the five liberals on this court, and Chief Justice Roberts makes that point in his dissent. He expresses skepticism as to the majority’s sincerity: “The majority graciously suggests that religious believers may continue to ‘advocate’ and ‘teach’ their views of marriage,” he writes. “The First Amendment guarantees, however, the freedom to ‘exercise‘ religion. Ominously, that is not a word the majority uses.”