Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P.O.E.
"This is the crux of the problem. If the State wasn't conferring benefits (tax breaks, health care, etc.) based on marital status, number of children, etc., there'd be less of a clamor to thus sign up for the freebies."

Again I say as I have been for years, we didn't need Gay Marriage we needed a Flat Tax, Steve Forbes was way ahead of his time....

26 posted on 06/28/2015 5:46:57 AM PDT by taildragger (It's Cruz & Walker. Anything else is a Yugo with Racing Stripes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: taildragger
"Again I say as I have been for years, we didn't need Gay Marriage we needed a Flat Tax, Steve Forbes was way ahead of his time.... "

Agree, 100% !

72 posted on 06/28/2015 7:12:27 AM PDT by precisionshootist (D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger

A flat tax, unlike a like-’Fair Tax’, does not nullify the issue vs. 13th Amendment....it is still an involuntary slavery tax (to degree).

Only a consumption would rightly restore these absurd discrepancies.


92 posted on 06/28/2015 8:43:29 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson