You have to seek them out and look them up. You have to analyze the data to see if it's relevant, and you have to contemplate how you intend to present it.
Even at that, you don't really succeed in making your point.
BTW, you were the one who brought up the whole Hawaii hands out BCs like lollipops.
I said I have read numerous articles that make this claim, and that I find it believable.
And then could not substantiate the claim.
I'm not terribly concerned if I convince you or not, and i'm certainly not interested in putting much work into the effort. At this point, this discussion is like debating how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin.
At this point, you are certainly putting a lot more effort into it than I have any intentions of doing.
Not really - all of the info is linked on a single page and with a fast connection pops up almost instantaneously.
For example the 1940 to 1961 live birth comes from a single table. cut and paste simple.
Analysis of the data?
I simply have cut and pasted the raw data, the table headings speak for themselves.
“I said I have read numerous articles..”
Which you preceded by saying Hawaii gives BCs to anyone and other states don’t. And presented a table that makes a false claim.
BTW - the “I said I have read numerous articles” is more unsubstantiated claims.
“I’m not terribly concerned if I convince you or not,”
Oh, I know I won’t convince you. It is enough to see you backtrack on the Hawaii birth certificate stuff. But till I know that in the future you will again present that bogus table and claim it says something it does not.
One final thought - I do agree with on one point. This discuss like the discuss of the meaning of the NBC clause is both casual and trivial to the rest of the world and both are exactly like “debating how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin.”
Both issues they involve are longtime settled.