It’s not a question of faith it’s a question of numbers and statistics.
The numbers were produced in 1961. All of the data is for US births only, zero foreign births are listed. Zero for any of the states
It is impossible to look at the numbers in your table and determine whether any foreign born children were registered as US births.
Frankly your table is outright dishonest. And if that is typical of one of your “other articles’, I would not expect them to be any more reliable.
And your faith in them.
The numbers were produced in 1961. All of the data is for US births only, zero foreign births are listed. Zero for any of the states
Because the newly created state of Hawaii would forthrightly report any such, wouldn't they? Why there was absolutely no pressure at all from millions of foreigners interested in buying US Citizenship after the second world war.
It is impossible to look at the numbers in your table and determine whether any foreign born children were registered as US births.
The numbers are not dispositive, merely indicative. What they indicate is that something is seriously out of whack compared to the other states.
Frankly your table is outright dishonest. And if that is typical of one of your “other articles’, I would not expect them to be any more reliable.
I think you are seeing what you want to see. Hawaii is full of resentful natives who never really wanted to be part of the US in the first place, and more or less regard us as conquerors. That they might undermine our civic borders is not a far fetched idea.
From what i've read, the national records and reporting rules were tightened about this time because of exactly these concerns. Hawaii was on the defensive about it's record keeping shortly after it became a state.