Please don’t use the name “ Con Con”, thank you.
A lot of people have picked up the name “Con Con” in error and it’s wrong. But I agree with the rest of your sentiment.
The Convention of States is not a Constitutional Convention. It is simply a meeting of state delegates appointed by state legislatures to propose amendments. Each amendment would have to be ratified by 38 states. So you can see the Constitution will be left intact.
No I meant a full out convention. We have to rewrite core articles or the moonbats in Washington will simply ignore the edicts. Or toss it out and write a replacement. The best way to control the three branches is to scratch their authority out of it altogether! Replace the branches. Everyone goes home.
We’re ready for it. Don’t be afraid as the existing articles and amendments are useless when all 3 branches are dysfunctional and ignore them anyway.
Better that than kicking the can down the street.
“The Convention of States is not a Constitutional Convention.”
Maybe you could explain the difference? I can’t.