Sounded to me like he was talking about a bargain to bring in one of the liberals. But he wouldn’t embrace such arrant nonsense as began this Brave New Reformulation of what a right means in the USA. Now it’s some free floating Entitlement.
So what free floating Entitlement gets the first place, going forward? Is this now a situation of Squeakiest Wheel Always Gets The Grease?
Will Christendom be able to resist the temptation to cheapen itself while going for the obvious hole here? (”Well, what about our rights too?” while remembering that those are bestowed by God and not by men and so if men refuse they cannot negate them.)
That makes sense too. And that way, since the nonsense has no legal effect, just glitter for the gullible, it's not really trading positions. He's just mocking the rhetoric, even if he agreed with the reasoning and conclusion.
-- So what free floating Entitlement gets the first place, going forward? --
Race, it's always race. Either they get bought out, or they create violent public mayhem.
-- Will Christendom be able to resist the temptation to cheapen itself while going for the obvious hole here? --
Some will, some won't.