those “marriages” will be meaningless in the eyes of the law. No inheritance rights, no tax protections, no pension benefits, nothing.
I think the discussion today should be when is the first animal and human marriage?
Well that would be true if the couple’s in question do not also dot their “i”s and cross their “t”s with the courts, which they already have to do this is just adding in a step on the civil side which is currently optional.