[Ronaldus Magnus]

"It is now clear that the challenged laws burden the liberty of same-sex couples, and it must be further acknowledged that they abridge central precepts of equality . . . Especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships, this denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry works a grave and continuing harm. The imposition of this disability on gays and lesbians serves to disrespect and subordinate them. And the Equal Protection Clause, like the Due Process Clause, prohibits this unjustified infringement of the fundamental right to marry."

This ruling provides no ability to prevent polygamous, incestuous, group, and beastial marriages in the future. The family no longer exists in law in this country.

[NYRepublican72]

This ruling provides no ability to prevent polygamous, incestuous, group, and beastial marriages in the future. The family no longer exists in law in this country.

That's how I would read it to polygamy and possibly incestuous marriages. I don't think you'd be able to marry your dog, however, as they can't grant consent.

[dila813]

A farmer should be able to marry all his animals and claim them as dependents as a mockery of this decision (not for beastual relations).

We should protest within the law how ever we can.