“If you want to ask me a question vette, you might want to ping me, that way I would know.”
My discussion was with him about you! And as you say, “I have the right to voice my opinion about you to him.” Also the matter of your “description” of him as a “liberal” is also nothing more that an “opinion” as well. That is simply name calling, and I thought it was inappropriate. I get it that you don’t like Trump, but I get a little tired of guys like you polluting the discussion between others with your “dislikes.” The discussion was about what Trump has been saying, not about him as a person. He’s not the best messenger, but a number of us happen to think what he’s saying needs to be said. Injecting your personal invective maybe makes you feel good, but it doesn’t do anything to move the discussion along.
After last night’s hour on Hannity, I think Carly Fiorina should be in the top ten. But my guess is that if, for some reason, you don’t like her, you will be up on some thread prattling along about how she was “fired” from HP which has nothing to do whatsoever with her political views, coupled with calling someone who sees value in her candidacy as a “liberal” or some other pejorative term to let us all know that you don’t like her.
Then you should have had the courtesy to ping me also so I could answer t your talking about me behind my back. You'll notice DoughtyOne did ping me because, unlike you, he has character.
And as you say, I have the right to voice my opinion about you to him. Also the matter of your description of him as a liberal is also nothing more that an opinion as well. That is simply name calling, and I thought it was inappropriate.
You're entitled to your opinion but frankly, I really don't give a damn how inappropriate you think it was.
I get it that you dont like Trump, but I get a little tired of guys like you polluting the discussion between others with your dislikes.
If you don't like it, why did you interject yourself in it when it did not involve you?
The discussion was about what Trump has been saying, not about him as a person. Hes not the best messenger, but a number of us happen to think what hes saying needs to be said. Injecting your personal invective maybe makes you feel good, but it doesnt do anything to move the discussion along.
The "discussion" is what we as individual members want to add to it. If you don't like what someone adds, just ignore it and move along. Why is that so hard for you?
After last nights hour on Hannity, I think Carly Fiorina should be in the top ten. But my guess is that if, for some reason, you dont like her, you will be up on some thread prattling along about how she was fired from HP which has nothing to do whatsoever with her political views, coupled with calling someone who sees value in her candidacy as a liberal or some other pejorative term to let us all know that you dont like her.
Now you're adding Fiorina to this thread? Just above you said, "The discussion was about what Trump has been saying, not about him as a person." You seem extremely confused on what should and should not be in a thread. It appears you believe you should be the one to decide.
Apparently you believe the "discussion" should be limited in focus. Now you say we should expand it to include other things like Carly Fiorina? I think you're an extremely confused individual who should learn how to post in Free Republic. Until you do you will continue making a fool of yourself. Your choice.
btw...Trump is a liberal jackass. Yes, that is name calling. But it is every bit the truth and I don't give a damn if you don't like it.
Have a nice day.