Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too; Publius

I know Publius will get behind an amendment to repeal the 17th as will I.

I think though that Amendment 28 is a ‘new thing’ that voters will get behind faster rather than revisiting an ‘old thing’ like the 17th. Because the history of the 17th will be dredged up if a serious effort is ever made to get its repeal going. All the negative history of pre-17th days can get in the way whereas the 28th might get voters to nod and say “yep, sounds good to me”.

But I am glad to see you sticking with the original founder’s meanings and intents. I’m pretty sure you would support the 28th if it started buzzing around your area.

I’m for either or both.


205 posted on 06/25/2015 8:04:53 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage
We could also encourage a Presidential candidate to run on a pledge of not signing any bills that include Congressional exemptions from the law. They may ultimately renege on that pledge, but that will then be a scar on their legacy.

-PJ

213 posted on 06/26/2015 4:10:07 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson