[TexasCajun]

If words have no meanings before the Supreme Court, there is no longer rule of law.

[GraceG]

[ If words have no meanings before the Supreme Court, there is no longer rule of law. ]

A VERY LARGE and VERY IMPORTANT Part of the Progressive’s Playbook is Language manipulation...

They who rule the language rule the men who are bound to that language...

[NorthMountain]

When a right to kill babies can be found to "emanate" from the "penumbra" of a "general right to privacy" unspecified anywhere in the Constitution ... there is no longer rule of law.

We have been living in an anarchic and corrupt kakistocracy since 1973.

[tanknetter]

There are some silver linings to this ruling.

For example, if words no longer have meaning in Constitutional law, the Democrats who cheer this ruling no longer have any reason for griping about Citizens United, corporations being considered people, etc. While the ruling says our logic is wrong, it completely kicks the chair out from underneath a lot of their supposed “logic”

[Carlucci]

Obama’s first directive after this ruling: “Find out how we can use this precedent to negate the word “twice” in the 22nd Amendment and GET ME ANOTHER TERM!”