Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trubolotta
If Britain and France could sell their goods in the south without the penalty of the tariff, they would compete with the north and in the long be willing to pay higher prices.

The same was true of Northern consumers. But how did that impact cotton supplies?

Your second comment misses the point that is being made that the south did not fight to protect slavery. It is a common charge you make but it is false.

Did someone tell the Southern leaders of the time? Because they all seem to think it was for slavery.

54 posted on 06/24/2015 5:03:32 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

By golly, I didn’t realize a simple lesson in economics might be required to explain southern concerns over tariffs. There are plenty of good sources concerning tariff issues between 1830 and 1860.

Would you care to quote a southern leader that said the war was all about slavery? How about a general, or plain old ordinary soldier? How about quoting a black Confederate soldier?

Consider this as well. A civil war is about taking control of government. Look at Rome, Spain and many other examples. The American Civil War is misnamed, but I would expect the victors would have it their way with history and facts be damned. The all-powerful federal government, or as its defenders would say, “we just wanted to preserve the union.”


56 posted on 06/24/2015 5:23:40 PM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson