He qualified his answer, saying repeal wasn’t the answer and this evil, Devil Worshippin, Satanic Inspired, Murderer was giving plenty of signals that no one paid attention to.
I’m giving this tub of lard a pass, as I think the article mis-characterises what he said in total and context...
“He qualified his answer, saying repeal wasn’t the answer and this evil, Devil Worshippin, Satanic Inspired, Murderer was giving plenty of signals that no one paid attention to.
I’m giving this tub of lard a pass, as I think the article mis-characterises what he said in total and context...”
No, he said that, although he would not support it, gun violence could be reduced by repealing the 2nd Amendment.
That is akin to saying that, although he wouldn’t support it, killing all blacks will reduce racial problems in the future.
See what he is saying? Why bring up something that is not supportable?
The way to say it is like this: “We know that taking awaay the 2nd Amendment is not a solution to gun violence.”