Since Global Warming is a hoax, and all the “moral” recommendations made by the Pope are predicated on the Hoax, none of those recommendations is relevant.
The encyclical contains religious language, but it teaches nothing, because its first premise is a Hoax.
Again, no matter how assert it, it is your judgment that Global Warming is a hoax, and that the encyclical contains religious language but it teaches nothing, versus the judgement of your vicar of Christ.
And no matter how much you protest it, you are acting contrary to Catholic teaching that i have supplied, despite your opinion of it, which broadly requires submission to public papal teaching, without making distinction, except for a higher level of assent for infallible teaching, and at the least forbids public dissent.
Another RC can follow your example and judge some other papal teaching as not being valid, as many do with aspects of V2. Do you hold hold all of that as requiring submission? When RCs can and must pick and choose btwn what in an encyclical of the like they need to submit to, then it is contrary to their invocation of papal leadership as being necessary to prevent believers choosing what to believe, and for unity.