I will place more stock in the constitutional legal opinion of a man who has argued a number of cases before the USSC, and won most of those, than the opinion of an unknown person posting on the Internet.
How many arguments before the USSC have you made?
Do you realize that your method of argumentation consists of veering between adulation of the individual and ad hominem against those with whom you disagree? Your argument consists of resort to authority while accusing the other side of failing to produce evidence, evidence which you adamantly ignore.