Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1
We need to get rid of civil asset forfeiture laws.

The 4th Amendment prohibits this action. One judge could fix this. Just one honest judge.

7 posted on 06/18/2015 5:42:39 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SpeakerToAnimals
The 4th Amendment prohibits this action. One judge could fix this. Just one honest judge.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The 4th Amendment is not limited to criminal procedures. Civil asset forfeiture is an unreasonable seizure, and as you observed it is unconstitutional. I am disgusted by any agent of the federal, state, or local government who participates in that form of theft.

10 posted on 06/18/2015 5:50:04 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SpeakerToAnimals
Just one honest judge.

A task for a latter day Diogenes.

16 posted on 06/18/2015 6:07:12 AM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Just what is the difference between a "centrist democrat" and a "moderate republican?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson